ISL Clubs Suspend Interim Management Committee Ahead of 2025-26 Season Kickoff
Less than 24 hours before the Indian Super League (ISL) 2025-26 season kicks off, all 14 participating clubs have suspended the league's Interim Management Committee (IMC). This decision stems from legitimacy concerns following resignations and withdrawals of key signatories, raising fresh doubts about the governance structure of Indian football. The clubs also introduced a new 75% voting rule for future league decisions.
Key Highlights
- 14 ISL clubs suspended Interim Management Committee.
- Suspension occurred less than 24 hours before ISL 2025-26 kickoff.
- Reasons cited include resignations and legitimacy concerns.
- Clubs introduced a new 75% voting rule for league decisions.
- IMC was formed to streamline communication, not independent decision-making.
- The ISL 2025-26 season has faced prior delays and uncertainties.
In a significant development that underscores ongoing governance challenges in Indian football, all fourteen Indian Super League (ISL) clubs have collectively suspended the league's Interim Management Committee (IMC) on February 13, 2026, merely hours before the kickoff of the ISL 2025-26 season. The dramatic decision, communicated jointly to the All India Football Federation (AIFF), highlights deep-seated concerns among the clubs regarding the committee's legitimacy and operational integrity.
The suspension was prompted by the withdrawal of Dhruv Sood, CEO of Sporting Club Delhi, as a signatory on behalf of the clubs, and the resignation of Ravi Puskur, CEO of FC Goa, from the IMC. The clubs argued that these changes "materially affect the functioning, composition, and representative character" of the committee, rendering its current structure untenable. Their joint letter explicitly stated that the IMC was established purely as a facilitative and representative body to improve communication and coordination between the clubs and the AIFF. It was never intended to operate as an independent decision-making authority, take major commercial, structural, financial, or regulatory decisions, or bind the clubs without their express collective mandate.
Consequently, the clubs resolved that the IMC, in its current form, could not continue to function effectively or legitimately. They declared the committee suspended with immediate effect, clarifying that it could no longer make decisions or issue communications on behalf of the clubs, and no position conveyed by it would be binding unless separately ratified. Adding to this, the clubs also proposed a new rule, requiring a 75% absolute majority for all future league decisions, aiming to consolidate their collective influence in the league's governance.
This move comes against a backdrop of considerable turbulence and uncertainty surrounding the ISL 2025-26 season. The formation of the five-member interim ISL club committee itself was a relatively recent event, constituted around January 30, 2026, with its members, including the now-resigned Ravi Puskur and withdrawn Dhruv Sood, being forwarded to the AIFF to help ensure the smooth conduct of the season. Its intended purpose was to bridge communication gaps and facilitate operations, with an understanding that it would dissolve once a formal governance structure was finalized or the season concluded.
The lead-up to the 2025-26 season has been particularly chaotic. The league faced significant delays and structural uncertainties, including a prolonged four-month pause in operations. The commercial viability of the league also came under scrutiny when FanCode secured the media rights for the reduced 2025-26 season with a bid significantly lower than previous agreements, indicating a substantial drop in the league's perceived value. This decline was attributed to the uncertainty and disruptions plaguing the league.
Furthermore, Indian football has been grappling with broader administrative issues, including a long-standing Supreme Court case concerning the AIFF's constitution and a disagreement over the Master Rights Agreement (MRA) renewal between the AIFF and Football Sports Development Limited (FSDL), the ISL's organizers. This impasse had led FSDL to put the 2025-26 season "on hold" in July 2025, causing clubs to pause first-team operations and suspend player and staff salaries, with some even threatening to shut down. The Supreme Court had to intervene, asking AIFF and FSDL to resolve the MRA issue.
The crisis is also intertwined with controversies surrounding promotion and relegation. The 2024-25 I-League season, for instance, saw a dramatic legal battle over its champion between Churchill Brothers and Inter Kashi, with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) eventually ruling in favor of Inter Kashi. These systemic issues, including a FIFA suspension of AIFF in 2022 due to third-party interference, highlight a history of governance challenges in Indian football.
Despite the institutional pause triggered by the IMC's suspension, the ISL clubs have reaffirmed their commitment to engaging constructively with the AIFF to ensure stability. However, their firm message is that no binding decisions will be accepted without documented majority backing. As the football begins on February 14, 2026, the governance questions remain far from settled, casting a shadow over the highly anticipated season.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Interim Management Committee (IMC) that was suspended?
The Interim Management Committee (IMC) was a five-member body constituted by ISL clubs in January 2026 to facilitate communication and coordination with the All India Football Federation (AIFF) and ensure a smooth 2025-26 season. It was not intended to be an independent decision-making authority.
Why did ISL clubs suspend the Interim Management Committee?
The clubs suspended the IMC due to concerns over its legitimacy and representative character, following the resignation of FC Goa CEO Ravi Puskur and the withdrawal of Sporting Club Delhi CEO Dhruv Sood as a signatory. The clubs felt these changes affected the committee's ability to function effectively.
When did this suspension occur in relation to the ISL season?
The suspension occurred on February 13, 2026, less than 24 hours before the kickoff of the Indian Super League (ISL) 2025-26 season, which was scheduled for February 14, 2026.
What are the broader implications of this decision for Indian football?
This suspension adds to a series of administrative challenges faced by Indian football, including past FIFA suspensions, disputes over media rights, and legal battles regarding governance structures. It highlights ongoing instability and demands for greater club autonomy and clear decision-making processes within the league.
What is the '75% voting rule' introduced by the clubs?
Alongside the suspension of the IMC, the ISL clubs introduced a new rule requiring a 75% absolute majority for all future league decisions. This is an effort by the clubs to ensure that significant decisions are made with broad consensus and to strengthen their collective influence over the league's operations.