In a hypothetical naval conflict, the United States Navy possesses an overwhelming advantage in conventional military capabilities and technological prowess against Iran's naval forces. The US Navy is globally recognized as the most powerful maritime force, operating 11 nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, 67 submarines, and 113 surface combatants, capable of extensive global power projection. This allows for sustained operations far from home waters and unmatched undersea dominance. In contrast, Iran's naval doctrine centers on asymmetric warfare, particularly within the strategic confines of the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy (IRGC-N), alongside Iran's regular navy, specializes in swarming tactics utilizing fast attack boats, naval mines, anti-ship missiles, and drones. Iran can deploy a diverse arsenal of anti-ship cruise missiles, drones, and ballistic missiles from coastal batteries and mobile launchers, designed to target vessels in the Persian Gulf. While technologically weaker than the US, Iran's geographical advantage and focus on 'guerrilla warfare at sea' aim to inflict high costs and deny access through critical maritime chokepoints. This involves surprise attacks, ambushes, and hit-and-run operations, which could significantly disrupt global trade, especially oil and LNG shipments passing through the Strait of Hormuz. The ongoing geopolitical situation in the Middle East and the Red Sea underscores the relevance of understanding these contrasting naval strategies and capabilities.