The Financial Times reports that leaders of the US shale oil industry are cautioning the Trump administration that its plans to revitalize Venezuela's oil sector could significantly harm domestic drillers. Following the recent capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and the US's announced intention to take control of Venezuela's vast oil reserves, the administration aims for US companies to invest billions to repair and restart the dilapidated infrastructure. However, shale executives fear that a substantial influx of Venezuelan crude into the global market could lead to an oversupply, driving down international oil prices. For many US shale producers, profitability becomes challenging when oil prices drop below $50-$60 per barrel, making the prospect of increased cheap Venezuelan oil a serious threat to their operations. Critics also highlight the irony that successful US efforts to boost Venezuelan oil production could inadvertently undermine Trump's stated goal of US energy dominance by 'hobbling' the domestic shale industry. Moreover, large US oil companies are reportedly hesitant to commit to the massive investment required—estimated at over $100 billion—due to the scale of repairs, security concerns, and political instability in Venezuela. Smaller, independent drillers might be more willing, but the long-term commitment needed for such a turnaround is substantial. This geopolitical maneuver, while potentially reshaping global energy dynamics and OPEC+ influence, presents a complex challenge for US energy policy, balancing foreign policy objectives with domestic industry interests.