The Supreme Court of India, during a recent hearing on the contentious issue of stray dogs, raised a poignant question to a counsel advocating for incentivized adoption of stray canines: why is similar passion not directed towards the adoption of orphaned children living on the streets? A three-judge bench, comprising Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and NV Anjaria, made this significant observation on January 13, 2026. The remark came after a counsel, representing an 80-year-old dog lover, suggested implementing a policy to encourage the adoption of 'Indie dogs.' Justice Sandeep Mehta specifically pointed to statistics of orphaned children on the streets, expressing concern that while extensive arguments were being made for animal welfare, human beings, particularly vulnerable children, often lacked such zealous advocacy. This exchange is part of a broader, ongoing case addressing the escalating challenges posed by stray dogs across India, including concerns about increasing dog bite incidents and the fixation of liability on states and dog feeders. The Court has consistently stressed the importance of balancing animal welfare with public safety, even hinting at imposing heavy compensation on states for dog bite-related deaths and injuries. The judicial proceedings reflect a continued effort to formulate a comprehensive and humane national policy to manage the stray dog population, while also subtly drawing attention to other pressing social responsibilities.