Canara Bank Faces Scrutiny Over Alleged Mis-selling of Policy to 90-Year-Old

Canara Bank Faces Scrutiny Over Alleged Mis-selling of Policy to 90-Year-Old | Quick Digest
A 90-year-old's life insurance policy with a Rs 2 lakh annual premium and a maturity date of 2124 has sparked outrage, with allegations of mis-selling against Canara Bank. The incident highlights growing concerns about bancassurance practices and consumer protection for the elderly, prompting regulatory attention.

Key Highlights

  • A 90-year-old allegedly was sold a life insurance policy with a 2124 maturity date.
  • The policy reportedly has an annual premium of Rs 2 lakh, totaling a significant amount.
  • This incident has raised serious concerns about mis-selling of financial products to vulnerable individuals.
  • Canara Bank has acknowledged the situation and stated it will forward the matter to the concerned team.
  • The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is working on stricter guidelines to prevent mis-selling by banks.
  • The case emphasizes the need for enhanced consumer protection for the elderly in financial services.
A concerning incident involving a 90-year-old individual and a life insurance policy with an unusually distant maturity date of 2124 has brought Canara Bank under scrutiny, with allegations of mis-selling. The policy, reportedly with an annual premium of Rs 2 lakh, has ignited widespread public outcry and raised significant questions about the ethical practices in bancassurance, particularly concerning the sale of financial products to vulnerable senior citizens. The family of the 90-year-old, identified as Venkatachalam V Iyer, alleges that the policy was aggressively marketed, creating undue pressure on him. According to reports, the policy was finalized in February 2025, with two annual debits totaling Rs 4 lakh already made from his savings account. The situation escalated when the elderly man received an alert for a subsequent premium, prompting his family to investigate. Further claims suggest a potential circumvention of age restrictions, with the branch manager allegedly advising the customer to open a joint account with his daughter, who was then listed as the 'life assured,' while the father funded the premiums. Documents were allegedly prepared by bank staff, with the customer's signature obtained due to his primary account holder status. Canara Bank, in response to the social media uproar, issued a statement acknowledging the inconvenience and assuring that the matter would be forwarded to the concerned team, while also requesting the user to refrain from sharing personal information publicly. However, the bank did not directly address the specific allegations of mis-selling or selling an age-inappropriate product. This incident is symptomatic of a larger issue within India's financial sector. The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) has reported a 14% year-on-year increase in mis-selling complaints in the 2024-25 period, with such cases forming 22% of all life insurance grievances. Recognizing the gravity of such practices, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has also signaled its intent to tackle these issues. Governor Sanjay Malhotra announced on February 6, 2026, that the central bank will issue comprehensive guidelines for banks and non-bank lenders concerning the advertising, marketing, and sale of financial products. These forthcoming guidelines are aimed at curbing the mis-selling of third-party products, including insurance policies, mutual funds, and portfolio management services (PMS), which are often pushed at bank counters without adequate suitability assessments. Typically, the maximum entry age for term life insurance policies in India is around 65 years, although some specialized plans may extend this. A policy sold to a 90-year-old, especially one with a maturity date set for 2124, clearly raises serious concerns about compliance with regulatory norms and the fundamental suitability of the product for the individual. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019, in India recognizes insurance as a service and provides consumers with recourse against unfair trade practices and deficiency in services. Policyholders can approach consumer courts at the district, state, or national level, depending on the claim value. Furthermore, the RBI's Banking Ombudsman scheme offers a free and expeditious grievance redressal mechanism for issues unresolved by banks. The recent developments underscore the critical need for robust consumer protection frameworks, especially for the elderly, who are often more susceptible to aggressive sales tactics and may lack the financial literacy to discern unsuitable products. The incident also has implications for Canara Bank's stock performance, as such controversies can erode investor confidence and attract increased regulatory scrutiny. On February 6, 2026, Canara Bank's stock was trading around Rs 147. The RBI's proactive stance in proposing stricter norms suggests a move towards greater accountability and a more customer-centric approach in the sale of financial products by banking institutions. The proposed guidelines are expected to cover advertising, marketing, and sales practices, with a strong emphasis on ensuring that products sold are suitable to customers' financial needs and risk appetite. The case of the 90-year-old policyholder serves as a stark reminder of the persistent challenges in ensuring ethical financial sales practices and the ongoing need for vigilance from both regulators and consumers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main allegations against Canara Bank in this case?

The main allegation is that Canara Bank mis-sold a life insurance policy to a 90-year-old individual, with an unusually high annual premium of Rs 2 lakh and a maturity date set for the year 2124. The family alleges aggressive sales tactics were used.

What is the significance of the policy maturing in 2124?

A maturity date of 2124 for a policy sold in 2025 to a 90-year-old is highly unusual and raises serious questions about the product's suitability and compliance with regulatory norms. Typically, life insurance policies have a maximum entry age and a reasonable maturity period.

What is Canara Bank's response to these allegations?

Canara Bank acknowledged the inconvenience caused and stated that the matter would be forwarded to the concerned team. They also requested the user to avoid sharing personal information publicly, but did not directly address the specific claims of mis-selling.

What actions are being taken by regulatory bodies like the RBI?

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has announced plans to issue comprehensive guidelines to curb mis-selling of financial products by banks and non-bank lenders. This includes ensuring that products sold are suitable for customers' financial needs and risk appetite.

What consumer protection mechanisms are available in India for such cases?

Consumers can file grievances with the bank's nodal officer, approach the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) via its Integrated Grievance Management System (IGMS), or file a complaint with the RBI's Banking Ombudsman. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019, also provides a redressal mechanism through consumer courts.

Read Full Story on Quick Digest