Yogi Adityanath Slams Opposition on Ram Temple Row, Karsevak Firing
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath criticized the opposition's 'double standards' regarding the Ram Temple, accusing parties that ordered firing on karsevaks in 1990 of now questioning donation management. His remarks come amid an SIT probe into alleged financial irregularities, which he assured would clarify everything. The CM highlighted the historical opposition to the temple versus current concerns.
Key Highlights
- CM Yogi accused opposition of 'double standards' on Ram Temple issue.
- He referenced 1990 karsevak firing under Mulayam Singh Yadav's government.
- Remarks made amid political row over alleged Ram Mandir donation irregularities.
- An SIT probe has been initiated into the donation allegations.
- Yogi contrasted opposition's historical stance with current criticism.
- He named Congress and Samajwadi Party in his criticism.
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has strongly criticized the opposition parties, particularly the Congress and Samajwadi Party (SP), for what he termed their 'double standards' concerning the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. His remarks, delivered amidst a political controversy surrounding alleged irregularities in Ram Mandir donations, revisited the contentious history of the Ayodhya movement, specifically the police firing on karsevaks in 1990.
Speaking at various public gatherings, including in Rudauli, Ayodhya, and before the monsoon session of the state legislature, CM Adityanath asserted that those who once ordered bullets and lathis against 'Ram devotees' are now attempting to 'preach' or feign concern over the temple's interests. He explicitly alluded to the events of October 30 and November 2, 1990, when security forces, under the command of then Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mulayam Singh Yadav of the Samajwadi Party, opened fire on karsevaks who had gathered in Ayodhya to participate in the agitation for the Ram Temple. Official records from that period indicate a death toll of 15-28, though the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) claimed higher figures.
Adityanath pointed out the alleged hypocrisy of these parties, noting that the Congress had previously tried to obstruct the temple's construction, even submitting affidavits in the Supreme Court claiming that Lord Ram never existed. Similarly, he accused the Samajwadi Party of being responsible for the firing on karsevaks and now trying to project themselves as guardians of 'Ram devotees' sentiments.
The Chief Minister's statements come at a time when opposition leaders have demanded a probe into the alleged misappropriation of donation funds at the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust. Responding to these allegations, CM Adityanath confirmed that a Special Investigation Team (SIT) has been constituted at the request of the Trust to investigate the matter thoroughly. He expressed confidence that the SIT probe would bring clarity and reveal the truth within 15 days, urging anyone with evidence to present it to the investigation team.
Yogi Adityanath also linked the opposition's current criticism to their historical stance against the temple. He highlighted that these were the same parties who had either opposed the construction of the Ram Temple or boycotted its consecration ceremony in January 2024. He emphasized that while these parties now raise concerns about the management of donations, they did not contribute to the temple's construction themselves. The Chief Minister urged the opposition to abandon 'negative politics' and adopt a constructive approach towards the state's development and prosperity.
The historical context of the 1990 firing remains a sensitive and politically charged issue in Uttar Pradesh. Mulayam Singh Yadav, who was Chief Minister at the time, had justified his decision to open fire on karsevaks, stating it was necessary to maintain law and order and save the Babri Masjid, although he later expressed regret on some occasions while reaffirming his stance on others. This historical event is often invoked by the BJP and its allies to highlight the contrasting approaches of different political parties towards Hindu nationalist movements and the Ram Temple cause.
CM Adityanath reiterated that the government treats any alleged theft of offerings with utmost seriousness, clarifying that while the temple trust is an independent body, the government ensured a fair investigation into the allegations once they surfaced. He added that six accused have been arrested and further steps are being taken on moral grounds. This ongoing political discourse underscores the deep-seated ideological divisions and historical narratives surrounding the Ayodhya issue, which continues to resonate significantly with the Indian electorate.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CM Yogi Adityanath's main accusation against the opposition?
CM Yogi Adityanath accuses the opposition of 'double standards,' alleging that parties which previously ordered firing on karsevaks during the Ram Temple movement are now pretending to be concerned about the temple's interests and questioning donation management.
What historical event is Yogi Adityanath referring to?
He is referring to the police firing on karsevaks in Ayodhya on October 30 and November 2, 1990, which occurred under the then Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mulayam Singh Yadav of the Samajwadi Party.
Why are there allegations of financial irregularities concerning the Ram Temple donations?
There have been allegations of misappropriation of donation funds at the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust, leading opposition leaders to demand a probe.
What is the government's response to the donation allegations?
CM Yogi Adityanath stated that a Special Investigation Team (SIT) has been constituted at the request of the Trust to investigate the alleged irregularities, assuring a thorough and transparent probe.
Which political parties are primarily targeted by CM Yogi's criticism?
CM Yogi Adityanath primarily targets the Congress and the Samajwadi Party, citing their historical opposition to the Ram Temple construction and the 1990 karsevak firing incident.