Shadab Ahmed Released on Bail in Delhi Riots Conspiracy Case | Quick Digest

Shadab Ahmed Released on Bail in Delhi Riots Conspiracy Case | Quick Digest
A Delhi Court has issued a release order for Shadab Ahmed, an accused in the 2020 Delhi Riots larger conspiracy case, after the Supreme Court granted him bail. Four other co-accused were also released earlier, while bail was denied to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam.

Shadab Ahmed released by Delhi Court after Supreme Court bail.

Supreme Court granted bail to Shadab Ahmed and four others on January 5, 2026.

Bail conditions include a ₹2 lakh bond and restrictions on public participation.

Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam's bail pleas were rejected by the Supreme Court.

Four other co-accused were released from Tihar Jail on January 7, 2026.

Case relates to the alleged larger conspiracy behind the 2020 North-East Delhi riots.

A Delhi Court, specifically Additional Sessions Judge Sameer Bajpai of Karkardooma Courts, issued a release order for Shadab Ahmed on Thursday, January 8, 2026. This development follows the Supreme Court's decision on January 5, 2026, to grant bail to Ahmed in the 2020 North-East Delhi riots larger conspiracy case. The release order was processed after Ahmed submitted his bail bonds and the Delhi Police provided verification reports concerning the documents and sureties. Shadab Ahmed is one of five accused who secured bail from the apex court, with the others being Gulfisha Fatima, Meeran Haider, Shifa Ur Rehman, and Mohd Saleem Khan. These four individuals had their release orders issued on Wednesday, January 7, 2026, and were subsequently released from Tihar Jail that night. The Supreme Court imposed stringent conditions on their bail, which include furnishing a personal bond of ₹2 lakh with two local sureties, remaining within the National Capital Territory of Delhi, surrendering their passports, and being prohibited from participating in rallies, public meetings, or circulating related promotional material. However, the Supreme Court notably denied bail to co-accused Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in the same case. The court observed that there was a prima facie case against them under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), citing their "central and formative roles" in the alleged conspiracy. The larger conspiracy case pertains to charges under the UAPA and the Indian Penal Code for allegedly orchestrating the communal riots that occurred in North-East Delhi in February 2020, following anti-Citizenship Amendment Act protests.
Read the full story on Quick Digest