Supreme Court stays Punjab govt action against Punjab Kesari newspaper | Quick Digest
The Supreme Court has granted interim relief to the 'Punjab Kesari' newspaper, directing the Punjab government not to take coercive action against its printing press. This comes after the newspaper alleged targeted harassment by the state government following critical reportage. The court's order will remain in effect until the Punjab and Haryana High Court delivers its verdict on the matter.
Supreme Court provides interim relief to Punjab Kesari.
Punjab govt barred from taking action against newspaper.
Allegations of targeted harassment by state government.
Order valid until High Court delivers verdict.
The Supreme Court of India has intervened to provide interim relief to the 'Punjab Kesari' newspaper, directing the Punjab state government to refrain from taking any coercive steps against its printing press. This decision came after the newspaper group alleged that it was being subjected to targeted harassment by the Aam Aadmi Party-led state government in retaliation for publishing news reports critical of the administration. Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing Punjab Kesari, informed the apex court that actions such as electricity disconnections to the press and the closure of hotels run by the group were initiated following unfavorable reportage. The Supreme Court, in its interim order, stated that the printing press of Punjab Kesari shall continue to operate uninterruptedly. However, it clarified that a status quo should be maintained regarding other commercial establishments owned by the group, such as hotels. This interim arrangement will remain in effect until the Punjab and Haryana High Court delivers its judgment on the petitions filed by the newspaper group and for a week thereafter. The Punjab government, through its counsel, contended that all actions taken were in accordance with the law and cited alleged violations of pollution control norms. The Supreme Court, while not commenting on the merits of the case, emphasized the importance of press freedom and questioned the justification for actions that could disrupt newspaper publication. The case highlights concerns about potential government overreach and its impact on media freedom in India.
Read the full story on Quick Digest