Netanyahu: Israel won't withdraw from Lebanon despite US-Iran peace deal

The core of this news revolves around a reported divergence in strategy between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump concerning a potential US-Iran peace deal and its implications for the conflict in Lebanon. Multiple sources indicate that Netanyahu has communicated to Trump that Israel will not withdraw its forces from southern Lebanon, regardless of the terms of any US-Iran agreement. This position presents a significant hurdle for the broader diplomatic efforts to de-escalate regional tensions. Reports suggest that Netanyahu views a US-Iran agreement, particularly one that might necessitate an Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, as detrimental to his political standing and security objectives. This has led to claims that he is actively seeking to "torpedo" the deal. The Times of Israel reported on June 13, 2026, that the Israeli government had instructed the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to avoid actions that could endanger the emerging deal between the US and Iran, although the Prime Minister's Office denied this as "fake news." Despite this, Israeli strikes in Lebanon have continued, with L'Orient Today reporting on June 14, 2026, that Netanyahu sees Lebanon as a critical arena for asserting Israeli action, even if a deal with Iran is reached. This included strikes on Beirut's southern suburbs and advances toward Nabatieh. The Jerusalem Post, on June 15, 2026, cited an Israeli source stating that Israel would not withdraw from southern Lebanon as part of any US-Iran deal, despite Iranian demands. An IDF source corroborated this, adding that if Hezbollah respects a ceasefire, there would be no further attacks in Lebanon. However, Israel did strike the Dahiyeh district of Beirut just hours before the US-Iran deal was reportedly finalized, a move that US President Donald Trump publicly denounced. The Jerusalem Post also reported on June 22, 2026, that a senior Israeli official denied Lebanese reports of planned troop withdrawals, emphasizing the IDF's continued deployment along the Blue Line for security protection. Further complicating the situation, multiple sources indicate a growing rift between the US and Israel. The Business Times reported on August 16, 2026, that Washington clarified that a "permanent military presence in southern Lebanon is inconsistent with the commitments" made under the understandings, pushing back against Defense Minister Israel Katz's declaration of preparing for a long-term presence. The Straits Times, on August 16, 2026, noted that the fighting in Lebanon, which resulted in at least 11 deaths including children, further complicated stalled US-Iran negotiations. The US is reportedly seeking de-escalation across Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran, with President Trump urging Israel to exercise restraint. However, Israel's actions, including continued strikes and insistence on maintaining its security zone in southern Lebanon until Hezbollah is disarmed, directly challenge these diplomatic efforts. The Indian Express on June 28, 2026, stated Netanyahu's position that Israel will not withdraw from Lebanon until Hezbollah is disarmed, a stance reiterated by Defense Minister Israel Katz. This has led to wide international opposition, though Israel has resisted changing course. The underlying tension stems from the differing priorities and political calculations of the involved parties. While the US, under Trump, has been pursuing a broader peace deal with Iran, including a cessation of hostilities in Lebanon, Israel under Netanyahu appears determined to maintain its operational freedom and security presence in southern Lebanon, viewing the disarmament of Hezbollah as a prerequisite for any withdrawal. This deadlock on the Lebanon front poses a significant challenge to the viability and implementation of the US-Iran peace agreement, with potential implications for regional stability.

Frequently Asked Questions

Read Full Story on Quick Digest