US Supreme Court Defers Trump Tariff Ruling; Treasury Ready for Refunds | Quick Digest
The US Supreme Court has deferred its highly anticipated ruling on the legality of former President Trump's tariffs. While awaiting the decision, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed ample funds exist for potential refunds, though the process could be lengthy.
US Supreme Court deferred ruling on Trump's tariffs, expected January 14.
Treasury Secretary confirmed sufficient funds for potential tariff refunds.
Refunds could amount to billions, potentially taking weeks or over a year.
Case challenges presidential authority under International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Decision holds significant implications for global trade and presidential powers.
Lower courts previously ruled against Trump's use of emergency powers for tariffs.
The US Supreme Court has postponed its highly anticipated decision regarding the legality of former President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs, initially expected on January 9, 2026. The Court instead issued a ruling on a criminal case and is now anticipated to deliver its next set of rulings on January 14, 2026. This ongoing deferral has kept businesses and global markets in suspense, with the case representing a significant test of presidential powers and its impact on the global economy.
Despite the delay, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has assured that the Treasury possesses more than adequate funds to cover any potential tariff refunds, should the Supreme Court rule against Trump's emergency tariffs. As of Thursday, the Treasury had nearly $774 billion in cash, with projections of an $850 billion balance by the end of March 2026, far exceeding the estimated $150 billion in potential refunds. However, Bessent cautioned that the actual timeline for processing these repayments could span "weeks, months, [or] may take over a year." Importers and trade lawyers have been bracing for a complex refund process, with some companies like Costco having filed preemptive lawsuits to secure their rights to potential repayments.
The legal challenge centers on Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977 to impose tariffs on a wide array of goods from numerous trading partners, including India, by declaring national emergencies related to trade deficits and other issues. Lower courts had previously ruled that Trump exceeded his authority under IEEPA, leading to the current appeal before the Supreme Court. The outcome is crucial for defining the limits of executive power in trade policy and will have widespread economic ramifications globally.
Read the full story on Quick Digest